TD BANK USA N.A. vs FELICITA CRUZTORRES
Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
The Order Dismissing this action pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 664.6 is set aside. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Citibank, N.A. and against Defendant Lisette Preciadogarcia for the principal sum of $2,171.79 plus court costs of $603.61, for a total judgment of $2,775.40. The Proposed Judgment will be signed by the Court. Plaintiff to give notice.
FEDERAL CREDIT UNION vs JARLENE MARQUEZ, et al. Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered Plaintiff Kinecta Federal Credit Union's ("Plaintiff") Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication of Issues ("Motion"), which was filed on May 19, 2026. The Court has also read and considered the Opposition of Defendants Jarlene Marquez and Ricardo Marquez ("Defendants"), which was filed on August 4, 2026. No reply has been filed by Plaintiff.
A motion for summary judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 437c(a)(3) must be heard no later than 30 days before trial, unless the court orders otherwise for good cause. The trial in this case is scheduled on September 15, 2026 - 11 days after the date of the hearing for the motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff did not request a continuance of the trial date or leave of the Court to schedule its motion for summary judgment within the 30-day period before trial. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion is denied without prejudice. The trial date of September 15, 2026 remains on calendar. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 25NWLC56838 Hearing Date: September 4, 2026 Dept: Y
25NWLC56838: TD BANK USA N.A. vs FELICITA CRUZTORRES Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff TD Bank USA, N.A. ("Plaintiff"), including the declaration of counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiff mailed Requests for Admission (RFA) to Defendant on January 7, 2026, and provided proof of service by mail. Plaintiff did not receive any responses from Defendant. Plaintiff mailed its Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted to Defendant on April 22, 2026, and provided proof of service by mail. The address for Defendant on both proofs of service match the address that is listed on the Answer. Having considered the moving papers, Plaintiff's Motion to Deem Requests for Admission Admitted is GRANTED. Plaintiff to give notice. Case Number: 25NWLC63842 Hearing Date: September 4, 2026 Dept: Y
25NWLC63842: CAPITAL ONE, N.A. vs SAMORIA MARTIN Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and reviewed the moving papers filed by Defendant Samoria Martin ("Defendant"), including the supporting declaration. Defendant filed and served its Motion on August 12, 2026 along with a Proof of Service by mail on Plaintiff Capital One, N.A. ("Plaintiff"). No opposition has been filed by Plaintiff.
Code of Civil Procedure section 1005 requires that "all moving and supporting papers shall be served and filed at least 16 court days before the hearing. . . . if the notice is served by mail, the required 16-day period of notice before the hearing shall be increased by five calendar days if the place of mailing and place of address are within the State of California." For proper notice to have been given by Defendant, this motion should have been served no later than August 8, 2026 for a hearing date on September 4, 2026. The Court continues the hearing on the Motion to September 24, 2026 at 10:30 a.m. in Dept. Y so that Plaintiff has sufficient time to file an opposition if necessary. Clerk to give notice. Case Number: 26NWLC28451 Hearing Date: September 4, 2026 Dept: Y
26NWLC28451: TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORPORATION vs JORGE BANDA Tentative Ruling: The Court has read and considered the moving papers filed by Plaintiff Toyota Motor Credit Corporation
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”