Fora Financial Asset Securitization 2024 LLC v. Y N S Contracting, Inc., et al.

party to give notice unless waived. Dated: September 4, 2026 | | | Brock T. Hammond Judge of the Superior Court | [1] City represents that if the motion is granted, City will voluntarily dismiss the remaining causes of action and submit a proposed judgment for the court's approval.

Judge Brock T. Hammond, Department 407 HEARING DATE: Se ptember 4, 2026 TRIAL DATE: N/A CASE: Fora Financial Asset Securitization 2024 LLC v. Y N S Contracting, Inc., et al. CASE NO.: 26STCV08473 APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT MOVING PARTY: Plaintiff Fora Financial Asset Securitization 2024 LLC RESPONDING PARTY: N/A

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Fora Financial Asset Securitization 2024 LLC ("Plaintiff") brings this action against defendant s Y N S Contracting, Inc. d/b/a Sushi Ray ("Sushi Ray") and Sun Bong (" Bong ") for breach of contract, breach of personal guaranty, and money paid. ¿ According to the Complaint, Fora Financial West, LLC ("FFW") entered into a written Business Loan and Security Agreement with Sushi Ray which was personally guaranteed by Bong. Defendants defaulted on the agreements. There is now due, owing and payable the principal balance of $ 70,730.0 4 and $105 in insufficient fund fees. Plaintiff also seeks $2,306. 70 in attorney fees for the first and second causes of action. FFW assigned its claims to Plaintiff.

On March 9, 20 26, Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant s and Does 1 to 100. ¿ On A pril 7, 202 6, Plaintiff served Defendant s with the summons and complaint by personal service. On May 8, 202 6, default was entered against Defendant s. On the same day, Plaintiff dismissed Does 1 t o 100 from this action and filed a default judgment application. On June 4, 2026, the court denied Plaintiff's application for default judgment because Plaintiff improperly sought to recover attorney fees in the sum of $ 6,920.10. Plaintiff now reque sts default judgment against Defendant s in the sum of $8 6, 512.9 4, consisting of $ 76, 314 (demand of complaint), $7,227,99 in interest, $66 4. 2 5 in costs, and $2, 306.70 in attorney fees.

II. DISCUSSION After review, the court finds Plaintiff has cured the defects noted in the court's previous order.

III. CONCLUSION Based on the foregoing, the application for default judgment is GRANTED. The clerk of the court to give notice to Plaintiff. Dated: September 4, 20 2 6 | |

| | | | Brock T. Hammond Judge of the Superior Court | | | Home -->)" -->