DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25628200·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayGRANTED

NEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOCIATES INC. VS. JONG CHENG WONG ET AL

Motion For Order Setting Aside Default

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNEMAN BROTHERS & ASSOCIATES INC.
DefendantJONG CHENG WONG
DefendantBICK LEW

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 4, 2026. Line 5. DEFENDANT BICK LEW Motion For Order Setting Aside Default is GRANTED. Default entered on June 26, 2026 is vacated. Plaintiff failed to comply with CCP 587. Request for Entry of Default attests to service of the Request on Bick You Lew, 55 Madrone Avenue, not on attorney of record, as required by CCP 587. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share