DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC23604990·sf·Civil·Premises Liability
Hearing 12 months agoDENIED

ALLAN MERCER VS. SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION

Hearing date
Aug 21, 2025
Department
302
Judge
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Adjudication rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffALLAN MERCER
DefendantSAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT COMMISSION
DefendantCITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO

Ruling

Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Thursday, August 21, 2025, Line 3. 2 - DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MOTION FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION.

Defendant City and County of San Francisco's motion for summary adjudication of plaintiff Allan Mercer's cause of action for premises liability is denied. Though the City's motion asserts that it "did not paint or design" the curb painting pattern which is the allegedly dangerous condition (City's initial memo at 2:6-7), the City does not submit sufficient evidence to establish this fact. As a result, the City fails to satisfy its summary motion burden and its motion is denied on that ground alone. The City's purported undisputed fact 5 that "Hertz is responsible for maintaining, inspecting, repairing, and painting the curb," even if true, does not rule out the possibility that the City created the curb painting pattern.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share