DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
24CV011792·sacramento·Civil·Complex Civil
Hearing todayThe Court will sign the stipulated consent order submitted. The Case Management Conference is continued to 01/22/2027.

MIXON, et al. vs WELLSPACE HEALTH, et al.

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
8B
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jan 22, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMIXON
DefendantWELLSPACE HEALTH

Ruling

24CV011792: MIXON, et al. vs WELLSPACE HEALTH, et al. 09/04/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 8B

Tentative Ruling

NO APPEARANCE REQUIRED.

The Court will sign the stipulated consent order submitted.

The Court sets a further CMC as set forth below.

The parties shall file and email a Joint Case Management Statement to the department no later than 15 calendar days before the next CMC. Please check your tentative ruling before the next Court date at www.saccourt.ca.gov. Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/divisions/civil/complex-civil-cases. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.

On the Court's own motion, the Case Management Conference scheduled for 09/04/2026 is continued to 01/22/2027 at 10:30 AM in Department 8B at Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye Courthouse.

To request oral argument on this matter, you must call Department 8b at (916) 874-5762 by 4:00 p.m., the court day before this hearing and notification of oral argument must be made to the opposing party/counsel. If no call is made, the tentative ruling becomes the order of the court. (Local Rule 1.06.)

Parties requesting services of a court reporter will need to arrange for private court reporter services at their own expense, pursuant to Government Code §68086 and California Rules of Court, Rule 2.956. Requirements for requesting a court reporter are listed in the Policy for Official Reporter Pro Tempore available on the Sacramento Superior Court website. Parties may contact Court-Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore by utilizing the list of Court Approved Official Reporters Pro Tempore.If you are not using a reporter from the Court’s Approved Official Reporter Pro Tempore list, a Stipulation and Appointment of Official Reporter Pro Tempore (CV/E-206) must be signed by each party, the private court reporter, and the Judge. The signed form must be filed with the clerk prior to the hearing. If a litigant has been granted a fee waiver

24CV011792: MIXON, et al. vs WELLSPACE HEALTH, et al. 09/04/2026 Case Management Conference in Department 8B

and requests a court reporter, the party must submit a Request for Court Reporter by a Party with a Fee Waiver (CV/E-211). The form must be filed with the clerk at least 10 days prior to the hearing or at the time the hearing is scheduled if less than 10 days away. Once approved, the clerk will forward the form to the Court Reporter’s Office and an official reporter will be provided.

If oral argument is requested, the Parties are encouraged to appear via Zoom with the links below:

To join by Zoom link - https://saccourt-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/16184738886 To join by phone dial (833) 568-8864 ID 16184738886 Please note that the Complex Civil Case Department provides information to assist you in managing your complex case on the Court website at https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/divisions/civil/complex-civil-cases. The Court strongly encourages parties to review this website regularly to stay abreast of the most recent complex civil case procedures. Please refer to the website before directly contacting the Court Clerk for information.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share