ELIZABETH KARNAZES VS. JUAN GARCIA ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
Motion To Quash Service Of Complaint
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Quash
Parties
- Plaintiff: ELIZABETH KARNAZES
- Defendant: JUAN GARCIA
- Defendant: RINALDI LAW GROUP, LLC
- Defendant: BRILL & ASSOCIATES, PL
- Defendant: RICHARD NIELSEN
- Defendant: JOSEPH RINALDI
- Defendant: DAVID BRILL
Ruling
Set for Law and Motion/Discovery Calendar on Tuesday, August 19, 2025, Line 2. DEFENDANTs RINALDI LAW GROUP, LLC, BRILL & ASSOCIATES, PL, RICHARD NIELSEN, JOSEPH RINALDI, and DAVID BRILL's Motion To Quash Service Of Complaint.
Defendants Rinaldi Law Group, LLC, Brill & Associates, PL, Richard Nielsen, Joseph Rinaldi, and David Brill's motion to quash service of the complaint on them is granted.
When a defendant moves to quash service of process due to lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the initial burden of demonstrating facts justifying the exercise of jurisdiction. (Zehia v. Superior Court (2020) 45 Cal.App.5th 543, 552.) To carry this burden, the plaintiff must do more than merely allege facts. The plaintiff "'must present evidence sufficient to justify a finding that California may properly exercise jurisdiction over the defendant.' " (Zehia, at p. 552, quoting In re Automobile Antitrust Cases I & II (2005) 135 Cal.App.4th 100, 110.) If the plaintiff satisfies the initial burden, then the defendant has the burden of demonstrating that the exercise of jurisdiction would be unreasonable. (Zehia, at p. 552.)
Plaintiff Elizabeth Karnaze fails to present any evidence showing that the Florida-based moving parties are subject to either general or specific personal jurisdiction in California.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 302 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 302 Zoom ID 160 409 7690; Passcode 516287.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept302tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept302tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/HEK) | |