DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
1458242·santabarbara·Civil·Conservatorship
Hearing 11 days agoCONTINUED

In the Matter of Conservatorship of Jose Flores Zepeda

Court Investigator's Annual Review

Hearing date
Aug 24, 2026
Department
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Aug 23, 2027
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

RespondentJose Flores Zepeda

Ruling

Nature of Proceedings Review: Investigator's Report Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on July 17, 2028. The Court will give notice.

Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Jose Flores Zepeda Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Jose Flores Zepeda Case Number 1458242 Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Mon, 08/24/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Court Investigator's Annual Review Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. No appearance is required. The next review hearing will be held on August 23, 2027, at 8:30 a.m. The Court will give notice of the hearing.

Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Carmen Paz Mendoza Tentative Ruling: Conservatorship of Carmen Paz Mendoza Case Number 22PR00059 Case Type Conservatorship Hearing Date / Time Mon, 08/31/2026 - 08:30 Nature of Proceedings Court Investigator's Review Tentative Ruling Probate Notes: No appearances are required. The court investigator's report has been received and recommends that the conservatorship continue. The next review hearing will be held on August 9, 2027. The Court will give notice of this hearing to all parties.

Tentative Ruling: Guardianship of Juan Ramon Chiyal, Jr., et al. Tentative Ruling: Guardianship of Juan Ramon Chiyal, Jr., et al. Case Number 18PR00141

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share