DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25624859·sf·Civil·Commercial Dispute
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED

ACES UP CASINO PARTIES, LLC VS. 3 OF A KIND CASINO EVENTS ET AL

MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE

Hearing date
Sep 16, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffACES UP CASINO PARTIES, LLC
Defendant3 OF A KIND CASINO EVENTS
DefendantBay City Events, Inc.

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Tuesday, September 16, 2025, Line 8. PLAINTIFF ACES UP CASINO PARTIES, LLC's MOTION TO ADMIT COUNSEL PRO HAC VICE.

The application of Brendan Ballou for pro hac vice admission is granted. Defendant Bay City Events, Inc. opposes on the ground that Ballou recently was granted pro hac vice admission in another matter in California. The court determines that a prior pro hac admission in the two-year period preceding this application does not constitute the "[r]egular[] engage[ment] in substantial business, professional, or other activities in the State of California" that would preclude pro hac vice admission. (Rules of Court, Rule 9.40, subd. (a)(3).) What constitutes regular engagement via prior pro hac admissions has not been precisely defined but the court concludes that it is more than one previous admission within two years.

Bay City Events additionally opposes on the grounds that it was not provided sufficient notice of the application pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure, section 1005, subdivision (b). The court exercises its discretion to accept the filing and discerns no prejudice.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share