ALFARO v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Motion to withdraw as counsel
Motion type
Parties
Attorneys
Ruling
lawyer and client(s), without implicating other parties, the court can rely on counsel's sworn declaration absent any reason to doubt the representations. There is an undisputed breakdown in attorney-client communications. It does not appear that Attorney Rodriguez's continued representation would serve the interests of justice. Counsel Rodriguez's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The Court notes the following upcoming matters: On September 18, 2026, there is an Order to Show Cause Re: Sanctions for Plaintiff's failure to appear on May 13, 2026.
ALFARO v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. CASE NO.: 26NWCV00011 HEARING: Thursday, September 3, 2026, at 9:30 AM Andrew Jung, Esq.'s motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Plaintiff Jorge A. Alfaro is GRANTED. Moving Party to give notice. The Court finds that Counsel has met the procedural requirements, including proper notice to the client at the last known residence or business address of the client. C.R.C. 3.1362. Here, Counsel's declaration indicates that there has been a breakdown of the attorney-client relationship.
Where the issue (or conflict) is between the lawyer and client(s), without implicating other parties, the court can rely on counsel's sworn declaration absent any reason to doubt the representations. There is an undisputed breakdown in attorney-client communications. It does not appear that Attorney Jung's continued representation would serve the interests of justice. Counsel Jung's motion to withdraw is GRANTED. The Court notes the following upcoming matters: On September 16, 2026, there is a Case Management Conference set for 9:00 AM. | Home -->
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”