DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26NNCV02380·la·Civil·General Civil
Hearing todayOSC discharged; Trial and Status Conference set

SOUTHWOOD FINANCIAL LLC vs DANIEL CHOE

Order to Show Cause

Hearing date
Sep 3, 2026
Department
X
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Jul 1, 2027

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffSOUTHWOOD FINANCIAL LLC
DefendantDANIEL CHOE

Ruling

(Alhambra Courthouse: Dept. X) September 3, 2026 DEPARTMENT X LAW AND MOTION RULINGS

Unless otherwise indicated in the tentative ruling, counsel/parties wishing to submit on a tentative ruling may send an email to alhdeptx@lacourt.ca.gov advising the Court and all counsel of their intention to submit. Prior to sending an email to Department X, counsel/parties should confer with any opposing or appearing parties in the action to determine whether all parties submit. Unless all parties submit, the matter will still be called for hearing and may be argued by any appearing/non-submitting parties. If all parties submit on the Court's tentative ruling, no appearance is necessary and counsel for moving party shall give notice of ruling unless otherwise ordered by the Court. This may be done by incorporating verbatim the Court's tentative ruling.

PASADENA, et al. The Ex Parte Application will be reviewed in chambers without oral argument. Any oppositions should be filed and served by 11:00 a.m. A ruling will be electronically or mail served to the parties. Case Number: 25NNCV00213 Hearing Date: September 3, 2026 Dept: X

A&E MEDICAL GROUP - A PROFESSIONAL NURSING CORPORATION vs CAREPATH MEDICAL GROUP INC., et al. The Ex Parte Application will be reviewed in chambers without oral argument. Any oppositions should be filed and served by 11:00 a.m. A ruling will be electronically or mail served to the parties. Case Number: 26NNCV02372 Hearing Date: September 3, 2026 Dept: X

#7 - KRISTINE PANOSYAN, AN INDIVIDUAL, et al. vs BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC

Based on the information contained within the parties' respective Case Management Statements, the parties are expected to complete party depositions - at a minimum, Plaintiff and Defendant's PMK depositions - and the vehicle inspection by September 30, 2027. Additionally, and to the extent not already completed, the parties are ordered to complete mediation (private or one of the Court's mediation programs - MVP, MCLA, or Resolve LA https://www.lacourt.org/ADR/programs.html) by the following date: Mediation Completion Date (non-appearance): October 29, 2027

Trial Setting Conference: November 3, 2027 at 8:30 a.m. in Department X of the Alhambra Courthouse. Trial will be set within 90 days of the TSC. Any party seeking a jury trial must post fees consistent with Code of Civil Procedure section 631. Court is to give notice. Case Number: 26NNCV02380 Hearing Date: September 3, 2026 Dept: X

#8 - SOUTHWOOD FINANCIAL LLC vs DANIEL CHOE

The Court has reviewed the declaration from plaintiff's counsel and defendant has answered the complaint. The Order to Show Cause hearings are discharged.

The Court also sets the following dates: Final Status Conference: Thursday, July 1, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. X. Bench Trial: Tuesday, July 13, 2027 at 9:00 a.m. in Dept. X. No party has posted jury fees pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 631.

The Court further orders the parties to comply with the Court's Trial Preparation Order, which may be found on the LASC website (https://www.lacourt.ca.gov/home), "Attorneys" section, under the "Courtroom Information" link for Department X (Alhambra Courthouse). Trial counsel are ordered to personally appear - in court - for the Final Status Conference with a copy of their lodged binders so that same can be reviewed in preparation for trial. Plaintiff is to give notice. Case Number: 26NNCV02409 Hearing Date: September 3, 2026 Dept: X

#9 - GUADALUPE CASTANO vs BURLINGTON STORES, INC., et al.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share