| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion For Assignment Of Rights, Restraining Order And Turnover Order
Matter on Calendar for Monday, August 11, 2025, Line 9, PLAINTIFF PERFORMANCE FOOD GROUP, INC.'S Motion For Assignment Of Rights, Restraining Order And Turnover Order.
The unopposed motion for an order assigning rights, restraining order, and turnover order is denied without prejudice. Judgment debtor Performance Food Group Inc. obtained a default judgment against the Napa Deli, Inc. et al. on July 11, 2025. Based on the complaint and the declaration of Cristin Garden submitted for the prove-up hearing, of which the court takes judicial notice, this action appears to concern unpaid food bills, not dental bills. Yet Performance Food's attorney declaration recites that the defendant is a dental practice. (Amended Dec. of David J. Cook, para. 2.) That appears to be in error. The list of persons and entities from whom judgment debtor seeks an assignment error is mostly a list of insurance companies, including many dental insurance companies, who seem unlikely to this court to be payees of this judgment creditor.
Code of Civil Procedure 708.510(a) makes clear that the assignment remedy is discretionary by stating that it is a remedy the court "may" order. On this application, the court declines to issue the remedy on the record before it because there is no proof that judgment debtor has demanded payment of the judgment, and because the list of likely payees is insufficiently supported. This order is without prejudice.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CVA) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”