DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
S-CV-0055515·placer·Civil·Civil
Hearing in about 5 hoursGRANTED

HENSCHEL, MATTHEW v. HENGL, KEVIN

Defendants Kevin Hengl and Richard Hengl’s Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Matthew Henschel and Lindsay Henschel’s Deposition Subpoena as to Third Party Morgan Clark or Morgan Clark Designs (MCD1, Inc.) and Sanctions

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Quash rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$3,260.00

Parties

PlaintiffHENSCHEL, MATTHEW
PlaintiffHENSCHEL, LINDSAY
DefendantHENGL, KEVIN
DefendantHENGL, RICHARD

Ruling

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR SEPTEMBER 4, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

19. S-CV-0055515 HENSCHEL, MATTHEW v. HENGL, KEVIN

NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on SEPTEMBER 4, 2026 AT 1:00 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.

Defendants Kevin Hengl and Richard Hengl’s Motion to Quash Plaintiffs Matthew Henschel and Lindsay Henschel’s Deposition Subpoena as to Third Party Morgan Clark or Morgan Clark Designs (MCD1, Inc.) and Sanctions

The motion is granted.

The deposition subpoena issued to third party Morgan Clark or Morgan Clark Designs (MCD1, Inc.) on February 5, 2026 by plaintiffs is quashed in its entirety.

Sanctions in the amount of $3,260.00 are imposed upon plaintiffs Matthew Henschel, Lindsay Henschel, and plaintiff’s counsel, jointly and severally.

///

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share