PAGAYA AI DEBT SELECT GRANT v. FLORY, SARAH

PLACER COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT FRIDAY, CIVIL LAW AND MOTION DEPARTMENT 1 COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR SEPTEMBER 4, 2026 AT 8:30 A.M.

These are the tentative rulings for the FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 4, 2026 at 8:30 A.M., civil law and motion calendar. The tentative ruling will be the court’s final ruling unless notice of appearance and request for oral argument are given to all parties and the court by 4:00 p.m., THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2026. Notice of request for argument to the court must be made by calling (916) 408-6481. Requests for oral argument made by any other method will not be accepted. Prevailing parties are required to submit orders after hearing to the court within 10 court days of the scheduled hearing date and approval as to form by opposing counsel. Court reporters are not provided by the court. Parties may provide a court reporter at their own expense.

NOTE: PARTIES MAY REQUEST A REMOTE APPEARANCE FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. (PLACER COURT LOCAL RULE 10.24.) More information is available at the court’s website: www.placer.courts.ca.gov.

Except as otherwise noted, these tentative rulings are issued by COMMISSIONER CHRISTINE S. DEHR. If oral argument is requested, it shall be heard at 8:30 a.m. in DEPARTMENT 1 located at the Historic Auburn Courthouse, 101 Maple Street, Auburn, California.

1. M-CV-0084706 PAGAYA AI DEBT SELECT GRANT v. FLORY, SARAH

NOTE: If oral argument is requested in this case, it shall be heard on SEPTEMBER 4, 2026 AT 1:00 P.M. in DEPARTMENT 1.

Plaintiff’s Motion for Entering Judgment

The motion is denied. Plaintiff has not made a sufficient showing that the parties entered into a settlement agreement in this instance. The declaration of Spencer Penuela states that the parties entered into a settlement agreement on December 15, 2023. However, there is no signature of the plaintiff appearing on the settlement agreement. It is also noted that defendant’s signature has no electronic authorization to verify it is defendant’s signature. It is further noted that that Penuela declaration refers to the filing of a Notice of Settlement of Entire Action. The court file does not reflect any such notice was ever filed with the court. Moreover, defendant filed an answer on August 31, 2026, which asserts – among other things – the statute of limitations bars the claim. For these reasons, the motion is denied.

PLACER SUPERIOR COURT – DEPARTMENT 1 Friday Civil Law and Motion – Tentative Rulings