DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24615755·sf·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 11 months agosustained with leave to amend

FRANKIE ANTOINE VS. DOES 1 TO 10

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Sep 16, 2025
Department
301
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffFRANKIE ANTOINE
DefendantWAYMO LLC
DefendantDOES 1 TO 10

Ruling

Matter on the Law & Motion / Discovery calendar for Tuesday, September 16, 2025, Line 6. DEFENDANT WAYMO LLC's DEMURRER to COMPLAINT.

Defendant Waymo LLC's demurrer to plaintiff Frankie Antoine's complaint is sustained with leave to amend.

Antoine pleads a motor vehicle negligence cause of action against Waymo. He asserts that he was driving while working for "Transdev-Waymo-Google" and that he was "rear ended by [a] hit & run driver." The court takes this to assert negligence by the hit-and-run driver, but any contention he has that Waymo was negligent is not clear.

Moreover, the "California's Workers' Compensation Act (Lab.Code, section 3600 et seq.) provides an employee's exclusive remedy against his or her employer for injuries arising out of and in the course of employment." (Melendrez v. Ameron Internat. Corp. (2015) 240 Cal.App.4th 632, 638 [citation simplified].) If he is suing Waymo as his employer for injuries that occurred in the course of his employment, workers' compensation is his exclusive remedy.

Antoine has not opposed the demurrer and it is not clear that granting leave to amend would be futile. The court grants leave to amend; any amendment must be filed within 20 days of notice of entry of this order.

For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.

Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.

Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.

The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(301/CVA) | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share