DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2022-01269531·orange·ComplexCivil·Final Accounting
Hearing todayCONTINUED

Lopez vs. Fairmont Schools, Inc., a California corporation

Final Accounting

Hearing date
Sep 3, 2026
Department
CX102
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Oct 29, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMarcus Lopez
DefendantFairmont Schools, Inc.

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULINGS 9/03/2026 02:00 PM

100 Lopez vs. Fairmont Schools, Inc., a California corporation

2022-01269531

Final Accounting

Plaintiff Marcus Lopez’s Final Accounting hearing is CONTINUED to October 29, at 2:00 p.m. in Department CX102 to confirm that the amount of the uncashed funds after the check-cashing deadline have been delivered to the State Controller’s Office Unclaimed Property Fund in the names of the applicable payees, that the administrator’s work is complete, and that the Court’s file thus may be closed. All supporting papers must be filed at least sixteen (16) court days before the continued hearing date. If the settlement funds are not completely disbursed by the report deadline, Class Counsel must request a continuance. Failure to do so may result in the issuance of an Order to Show Cause re Monetary Sanctions.

Plaintiff is ordered to give notice of this ruling to Defendant. 101 Rojo vs. Farwest Insulation Contracting, a California corporation

2022-01259062 Final Accounting

The court finds all settlement distribution efforts are fully concluded. The administrator’s final report (ROA 301) is thus approved, and the court’s file is closed.

Plaintiff to give notice of the court’s ruling and file proof of service.

102 Fulfer vs. CareCar, Inc.

2022-01299427 1.Motion to Be Relieved as Counsel of Record 2. Status Conference Attorney Tamar G. Arminak of the law firm Arminak Law, APC’s motion to be relieved as counsel of record for Defendant Carecar, Inc. is GRANTED, effective upon the filing of the proof of service of the signed order upon the client. (Code Civ. Proc., § 284, subd. 2.)

Moving counsel shall lodge with the Court an updated proposed order that lists in ¶ 7 updated information on the next scheduled hearing.

The Court notes that a corporation may not represent itself in propria persona but must be represented by a licensed attorney. (See Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Mun. Ct. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 724, 730 [corporation may not represent itself and must appear through a licensed attorney]; CLD Construction, Inc. v. City of San Ramon (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 1141, 1150 [“court retains authority to dismiss an action if an unrepresented corporation does not obtain counsel within reasonable

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share