DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25CV473427·santaclara·Civil·Order of Examination
Hearing in about 4 hoursCONTINUED

Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. Nevarez Moving Company LLC, et al.

Order of Examination

Hearing date
Sep 4, 2026
Department
16
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCreditors Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
DefendantNevarez Moving Company LLC
DefendantJ. Orlando Nevarez

Ruling

LINE CASE NO. CASE TITLE TENTATIVE RULING 9:01 25CV473427 Creditors Adjustment Bureau, Hearing: Order of Examination 1 Inc. v. On May 8, 2026, the Court ORDERED Nevarez Moving Company LLC, J. Orlando Nevarez, CEO of Defendant et al. Judgment Debtor Nevarez Moving Company LLC, to appear personally on September 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 to give information regarding a money judgment against Defendant Judgment Debtor Nevarez Moving Company LLC (the “Order of Examination”).

But on June 29, 2026, Plaintiff Judgment Creditor, Creditors Adjustment Bureau, filed a Declaration of Non Service regarding this Order of Examination on J. Orlando Nevarez, CEO of Nevarez Moving Company LLC. This Declaration states that the address where Plaintiff tried to serve this Order of Examination is a “Bad Address[;] according to neighbors the address is vacant.” Declaration at ¶ 2 (filed: June 29, 2026).

Because J. Orlando Nevarez, CEO of Nevarez Moving Company LLC, has not yet been served with the Order of Examination, the Court cannot issue a Civil Bench Warrant against him yet.

The parties are to appear in person at this hearing on September 4, 2026 at 9:01 AM in Department 16 to discuss next steps in this case.

SO ORDERED. 9:01 2 9:01 3 9:01 4

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share