DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
25FL0574·eldorado·Civil·Dissolution of Marriage
Hearing todayReview hearing dropped

Megan A. Pierce v. Tyler L. Pierce

Review of Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA) status

Hearing date
Sep 3, 2026
Department
5
Judge
Prevailing
N/A
Appearance
Not required

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PetitionerMegan A. Pierce
RespondentTyler L. Pierce

Ruling

LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 September 3, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.

8. MEGAN A. PIERCE V. TYLER L. PIERCE 25FL0574

On June 24, 2026, the parties appeared before the court for a long cause trial on all issues. The parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement and the matter was set for a review hearing to address the status of the Marital Settlement Agreement (MSA).

The parties submitted a judgment with an attached MSA on August 20th. The court has not yet had the opportunity to review the judgment however because the parties have completed their MSA and submitted it, the review hearing is dropped from calendar.

TENTATIVE RULING #8: THE REVIEW HEARING IS DROPPED FROM CALNDAR AS THE MSA HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED.

NO HEARING ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HELD UNLESS A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT IS TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE COURT’S WEBSITE OR BY PHONE CALL TO THE COURT AT (530) 621-6725 BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07; SEE ALSO LEWIS V. SUPERIOR COURT, 19 CAL.4TH 1232, 1247 (1999). NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES OF A REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND THE GROUNDS UPON WHICH ARGUMENT IS BEING REQUESTED MUST BE MADE BY PHONE CALL OR IN PERSON BY 4:00 P.M. ON THE DAY THE TENTATIVE RULING IS ISSUED. CAL. RULE CT. 3.1308; LOCAL RULE 8.05.07.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share