Pamela Deherrera v. Julian Deherrera
RFO for property control and other orders
Motion type
Causes of action
Parties
Ruling
LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS DEPARTMENT 5 September 3, 2026 8:30 a.m./1:30 p.m.
13. PAMELA DEHERRERA V. JULIAN DEHERRERA 23FL0888
Respondent filed a Request for Order (RFO) on June 11, 2026 requesting property control along with other orders. Petitioner was personally served with some, but not all the required documents on June 11, 2026.
Petitioner filed a Responsive Declaration on August 19, 2026. Respondent was served on August 14, 2026. Petitioner does not raise the issue of the defect in service in her Responsive Declaration, therefore, the court deems it to have been waived.
The court finds it needs to take testimony from the parties. The parties are ordered to appear to select Mandatory Settlement Conference (MSC) and trial dates.
TENTATIVE RULING #13: THE COURT FINDS IT NEEDS TO TAKE TESTIMONY FROM THE PARTIES. THE PARTIES ARE ORDERED TO APPEAR TO SELECT MANDATORY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE (MSC) AND TRIAL DATES.
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”