THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs PEREZ, DESTINY

The following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Judge David I. Hood in Department 24: CV-22-004359 - THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA vs PEREZ, DESTINY - a) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Response to Form Interrogatories, Set No. One As to Destiny Perez - HEARING REQUIRED. b) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Request for Admissions- HEARING REQUIRED. c) Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Response to Request for Inspection of Documents and Tangible Things - HEARING REQUIRED.

a) The Court notes proof of service of the discovery request shows that the defendant was served on 6/25/25, by regular mail to FCI Waseca in Waseca Minnesota. Declaration of Aurora Maddocks, Exhibit A, page 19. However, the printout attached from Find an Inmate attached as Exhibit B shows that the defendant is located at the FCI in Tallahassee Florida. Declaration of Aurora Maddocks, Exhibit B, page 21. The proofs of service for the moving papers show that the defendant was served on 6/30/26, by overnight mail to FCI Tallahassee. Prior to addressing the Motion, the court requires clarification concerning whether the defendant was properly served with the discovery requests and with the moving papers.

b) The Court notes proof of service of the discovery request shows that the defendant was served on 6/25/25, by regular mail to FCI Waseca in Waseca Minnesota. Declaration of Aurora Maddocks, Exhibit A, page 19. However, the printout attached from Find an Inmate attached as Exhibit B shows that the defendant is located at the FCI in Tallahassee Florida. Declaration of Aurora Maddocks, Exhibit B, page 21. The proofs of service for the moving papers show that the defendant was served on 6/30/26, by overnight mail to FCI Tallahassee. Prior to addressing the Motion, the court requires clarification concerning whether the defendant was properly served with the discovery requests and with the moving papers.

c) The Court notes proof of service of the discovery request shows that the defendant was served on 6/25/25, by regular mail to FCI Waseca in Waseca Minnesota. Declaration of Aurora Maddocks, Exhibit A, page 19. However, the printout attached from Find an Inmate attached as Exhibit B shows that the defendant is located at the FCI in Tallahassee Florida. Declaration of Aurora Maddocks, Exhibit B, page 21. The proofs of service for the moving papers show that the defendant was served on 6/30/26, by overnight mail to FCI Tallahassee. Prior to addressing the Motion, the court requires clarification concerning whether the defendant was properly served with the discovery requests and with the moving papers.

The following is the tentative rulings for a case calendared before Commissioner Richard Moths in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, CA: ***There are no tentative rulings in Department 19***