| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion And Motion To Seal Documents Filed In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC23606289 - August 8, 2025 Hearing date: August 8, 2025 Case number: CGC23606289 Case title: DANIEL KNIGHT ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC23606289 | Case Title: | | DANIEL KNIGHT ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-08 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Seal Documents Filed In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication | Rulings: | | Matter on Calendar for Friday, August 8, 2025, Line 4, DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO'S (ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS LAGUNA HONDA HOSPITAL AND REHABILITATION CENTER) Motion To Seal Documents Filed In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment, Or In The Alternative Summary Adjudication.
The unopposed motion to seal is granted. The declaration establishes that the matter sought to be sealed contains medical records; such records are protected from disclosure under federal and state privacy laws. The court finds that (1) There exists an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to the record; (2) The overriding interest supports sealing the record; (3) A substantial probability exists that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; (4) The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored; and (5) No less restrictive means exist to achieve the overriding interest.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CVA) | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”