Jesus Ojeda (Torres) v. Maria Lucina Ojeda
Request for Order for Spousal Support
Motion type
Causes of action
Monetary amounts referenced
Parties
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 JESUS OJEDA (TORRES),) Case Number: FDI-25-801588) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: September 3, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 MARIA LUCINA OJEDA,) Department: 403) 10 Respondent) Presiding: BOBBY P. LUNA) 11) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR SPOUSAL SUPPORT 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the 15 Court makes the following findings and orders: 16 A. Procedural History 17 1) The parties are Petitioner Jesus Ojeda (Torres) and Respondent Maria Lucinda Ojeda.
They share 18 no minor children. 19 2) On 6/24/25, Petitioner filed a Petition for Dissolution indicating the date of marriage is 8/1/13 and 20 date of separation is 1/18/25 for a marriage of 11 years and 5 months. 21 3) On 2/23/26, Respondent filed a Response and Request for Dissolution indicating the date of 22 marriage is 8/1/13 and date of separation is 1/18/25 for a marriage of 11 years and 5 months. 23 4) On 7/10/26, Respondent filed a Request for Order seeking guideline temporary monthly spousal 24 support.
Respondent estimates Petitioner’s income is $7,160 per month based on Petitioner’s 25 2023 tax return (attached as Exhibit 1). 26 5) On 7/16/26, Respondent filed an Income and Expense Declaration indicating she earns $3,946 in 27 average monthly income, pays $48 in required monthly union dues, has $200 in cash assets, and 28 pays $2,123 in average monthly expenses. 29
1 6) On 7/21/26, Respondent filed a Proof of Service by Mail indicating counsel for Petitioner was 2 served the Request for Order on 7/1/26. The Court notes there is no indication that Respondent 3 served her Income and Expense Declaration or a copy of the Tentative Ruling Instructions. 4 7) Petitioner did not file a Responsive Declaration. 5 8) The Court also notes that counsel for Petitioner filed a Notice of Unavailability of Counsel from 6 6/10/26 – 8/10/26. 7 B. Findings and Order 8 1) The Court finds good cause to CONTINUE Respondent’s Request for Order filed 7/10/26 to 9 10/27/26 at 9 AM in Dept. 403 to ensure proper service was effectuated as there is no indication 10 that Respondent served her Income and Expense Declaration or a copy of the Tentative Ruling 11 Instructions on Petitioner. 12 2) At least 16 Court days prior to the next hearing date, Respondent shall serve on Petitioner the (a) 13 Request for Order, (b) Income and Expense Declaration, (c) Continuance Order contained herein, 14 and (d) Tentative Ruling Instructions using a service method authorized by the Code of Civil 15 Procedure. 16 3) At least 9 Court days prior to the next hearing date, Petitioner may file and serve a Responsive 17 Declaration and shall file and serve an Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150), which is 18 a mandatory form. 19 4) At least 5 Court days prior to the next hearing date, Respondent may file and serve a Reply 20 Declaration. 21 5) Should Petitioner fail to file an Income and Expense Declaration (form FL-150) as ordered 22 herein, the Court will use Respondent’s estimation of Petitioner’s monthly income ($7,160 per 23 month) to calculate guideline monthly spousal support, which Respondent presented to the Court 24 under penalty of perjury. 25 6) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing. 26
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”