DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD26681510·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing todayCONTINUED

1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP VS. SHAVON BUTLER ET AL

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Adjudication In Favor Of Plaintiff

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Sep 16, 2026

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Summary Judgment rulings statewide →

Parties

Plaintiff1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP
DefendantSHAVON BUTLER

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for September 2, 2026. Line 7. PLAINTIFF 1140 HARRISON ASSOCIATES LP MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Or, In The Alternative, For Summary Adjudication is continued to September 16, 2026 to be heard with other pending motion. This matter will be heard in department 505 by the Honorable Michelle Tong at 1:30 p.m. per the order of the presiding judge. =(501/MT) Parties may appear in-person, or via Zoom Video Conference (Meeting ID: 160 4132 4666 Passcode: 872834).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share