DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26SMCV04611·la·Civil·General Civil
Hearing todayPENDING

170.6 challenge

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
I
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

is OVERRULED. Finally, the sixteenth cause of action is for an accounting. Defendants state that this is not really all that complicated such that a fixed sum cannot be alleged. The court disagrees, at least at the pleading stage. And there is no time bar, either. The demurrer is OVERRULED. The motion to strike is DENIED. But defendants can rest assured that plaintiffs will not be awarded attorneys' fees absent a basis to do so. As of now, it is too early to tell. Defendants have 10 court days to answer.

there is going to be a 170.6 challenge. Because this matter was continued to allow the challenge to be made, assuming plaintiff gave notice of the ruling, the court is prepared to rule today if there is no such challenge. | Home -->)" -->

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share