| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Motion To Strike Amended Complaint
Matter on Calendar for Monday, August 11, 2025, Line 3, Defendant Aspiranet's Motion To Strike Amended Complaint.
Defendant Aspiranet's motion to strike portions of Plaintiff Tiffany Cabrales's First Amended Complaint is granted. Plaintiff has leave to amend the complaint within 20 days of this order to include factual allegations-rather than legal conclusions-that would support awarding punitive damages.
Treble Damages: Cabrales concedes that treble damages are not available here. The motion to strike is granted as to any reference to Aspiranet's liability for treble damages.
Punitive Damages: A motion to strike punitive damages may be granted when the facts alleged do not rise to the level of "malice, fraud or oppression" required to support a punitive damages award. (Turman v. Turning Point of Central Calif., Inc. (2010) 191 Cal.App.4th 53, 63.) The Plaintiff must plead "the ultimate facts showing an entitlement to such relief," and "judges read allegations of a pleading subject to a motion strike as a whole, all parts in their context, and assume their truth." (Clauson v.
Superior Court (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1253, 1255.) "In order to state a prima facie claim for punitive damages, a complaint must set forth the elements as stated in the general punitive damage statute." (Turman, 191 Cal.App.4th at p. 63.) Cabrales pleads no specific facts in her complaint, merely stating that Aspiranet had a duty to protect her from sexual abuse, failed to do so, and was on constructive or actual notice of the abuse. Cabrales's Doe pleading allegations essentially amount to reciting legal conclusions.
This is insufficient; Cabrales need not allege evidentiary facts but must allege ultimate facts supporting her entitlement to punitive damages. (See Doe v. City of Los Angeles (2007) 42 Cal.4th 531, 550.)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CVA) | |