DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000062·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayAppearance required.

In The Matter of The Charles and Gwendolyn Olson Estate

Review Hearing

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
Dept. B
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Ruling

Conservatorship of Duenas, Janelli 26-47375

REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on September 01, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

Conservatorship of Neller, Adam Thomas 26-52441

REVIEW HEARING

TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on September 01, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.

**at 9:30 a.m.** In The Matter of The Charles and Gwendolyn Olson Estate 26PR000062

REVIEW HEARING

APPEARANCE REQUIRED

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Balcal Construction, Inc. v. Suzanne Giraudo et al 23CV001364

DEFENDANTS/CROSSCOMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET TWO AND FORM INTERROGATORY NO 17.1, SET TWO

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is DENIED.

11

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share