Conservatorship of Duenas, Janelli
Review Hearing
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
Conservatorship of Duenas, Janelli 26-47375
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on September 01, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
Conservatorship of Neller, Adam Thomas 26-52441
REVIEW HEARING
TENTATIVE RULING: After a review of the matter, the Court finds the Conservator is acting in the best interest of the Conservatee. Thus, the case is set for a Review – Biennial hearing in two years, on September 01, 2028, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. B. The Court Investigator shall prepare a biennial investigator report for the next hearing date. The Clerk is directed to send notice to the parties.
**at 9:30 a.m.** In The Matter of The Charles and Gwendolyn Olson Estate 26PR000062
REVIEW HEARING
APPEARANCE REQUIRED
CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.
Balcal Construction, Inc. v. Suzanne Giraudo et al 23CV001364
DEFENDANTS/CROSSCOMPLAINANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, SET TWO AND FORM INTERROGATORY NO 17.1, SET TWO
TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is DENIED.
11
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”