DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
2025CUBC055022·ventura·Civil·Civil
Hearing todayGRANTED

JAQUELINE TORRES, et al. vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC.

Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Seal Pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ Complaint

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
44
Judge
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJAQUELINE TORRES
DefendantAMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC.

Ruling

2025CUBC055022: JAQUELINE TORRES, et al. vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC. 09/02/2026 in Department 44 Motion Pages 7 & 8 of Exhibit "A" of Plaintiffs' Complaint

Department Rules. Parties and counsel shall follow the Department 44 rules and Zoom protocols, available at https://www2.ventura.courts.ca.gov/Courtroom/C44.

Remote Appearances. The Court allows Zoom appearances as a courtesy to parties and counsel. The Court does not accommodate Court Call appearances. You MUST register by 3:00 p.m. the court day before your hearing or you will be DENIED entry to the hearing:

ZOOM Registration Link:

https://ventura-courts-ca.zoom.us/meeting/register/iqN7uhQSQMuOqs-9TQXgEQ

No advance notice is required to appear in person.

Tentative Rulings. Oral argument should address the tentative decision. To submit on the tentative decision, email courtroom44@ventura.courts.ca.gov before 8:00 a.m. on the hearing date, copying all other parties. Use the subject line “SUBMISSION ON TENTATIVE”, [Case Number], [Case Title] and [Party]. If not all parties submit, the hearing will proceed, and the tentative ruling may change.

The Court may adopt, modify or reject the tentative ruling after hearing. The tentative ruling has no legal effect unless and until adopted by the Court.

Motion: Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Seal Pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ Complaint

Tentative Ruling:

Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal Pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is GRANTED as follows:

The Court expressly finds that:

1. Plaintiffs possess an overriding privacy and security interest in preventing public disclosure of their full social security numbers, which overcomes the public right of access to that information;

2. That overriding interest supports sealing the unredacted versions of pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit A to the Complaint;

2025CUBC055022: JAQUELINE TORRES, et al. vs AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR COMPANY, INC.

3. There is a substantial probability that Plaintiffs’ privacy and security interests will be prejudiced if their full social security numbers remain publicly accessible;

4. The sealing ordered herein is narrowly tailored because only the unredacted versions of the two pages containing the social security numbers will be maintained under seal, while redacted versions of those pages will remain publicly available; and

5. No less restrictive means exists to prevent continued public access to the social security numbers already contained in the filed unredacted versions while preserving public access to the nonprotected portions of the documents.

The Clerk is directed to place the presently filed unredacted versions of pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit A to Plaintiffs’ December 2, 2025 Complaint under seal.

Within five court days, Plaintiffs shall file public replacement copies of pages 7 and 8 of Exhibit A with Plaintiffs’ social security numbers fully redacted. All remaining portions of those pages shall remain unredacted and available in the public file.

No other portion of the Complaint or Exhibit A is ordered sealed. The sealing order itself and the register of actions shall remain public. The sealed unredacted pages may be inspected by the Court, the parties, and their counsel unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

Plaintiffs to give notice.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share