BRYANT FU VS. SHUZHEN TU ET AL
Case Information
Motion(s)
DEFENDANT LEGAL RECOVERY, LLC'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS
Motion Type Tags
Motion to Quash
Parties
- Plaintiff: BRYANT FU
- Defendant: SHUZHEN TU
- Defendant: LEGAL RECOVERY, LLC
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC22599369 - August 5, 2025 Hearing date: August 5, 2025 Case number: CGC22599369 Case title: BRYANT FU VS. SHUZHEN TU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22599369 | Case Title: | | BRYANT FU VS. SHUZHEN TU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-05 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS | Rulings: | | Matter on Calendar for Tuesday, August 5, 2025, Line 4, 1. DEFENDANT LEGAL RECOVERY, LLC'S MOTION TO QUASH SERVICE OF SUMMONS OR STAY OR DISMISS.
Specially appearing defendant Legal Recovery LLC moves to quash plaintiff Bryant Fu's service of summons and moves for dismissal pursuant to CCP 583.250 (prescribing dismissal if service is not made within three years). The motion is denied.
"When a defendant challenges the court's personal jurisdiction on the ground of improper service of process, the burden is on the plaintiff to prove the existence of jurisdiction by proving, inter alia, the facts requisite to an effective service." (Summers v. McClanahan (2006) 140 Cal.App.4th 403, 413 [simplified].)
Here, Fu has filed a proof of service showing service on Legal Recovery LLC's agent for service of process, Demas Yan (aka Dennis Yan). The court takes judicial notice of the Secretary of State's online record of Legal Recovery's agent as Demas Yan. Fu also provides a declaration from himself and his father, Tony Fu, further attesting to service. Yan provides a declaration stating that no service occurred. But the proof of service is proper on its face, complies with statutory requirements for service, and is supported by declarations carrying Fu's burden.
Moreover, Legal Recovery has actual notice of this lawsuit. (Cf. Ramos v. Homeward Residential, Inc. (2014) 223 Cal.App.4th 1434, 1443 ["As stated in the Nov. 25, 1968, Report of the Judicial Council's Special Committee on Jurisdiction, pp. 14-15: 'The provisions of this chapter should be liberally construed to effectuate service and uphold the jurisdiction of the court if actual notice has been received by the defendant, and in the last analysis the question of service should be resolved by considering each situation from a practical standpoint. ...' "].)
Because the court finds the March 10, 2025 proof of service sufficient to afford personal jurisdiction over Legal Recovery, it does not address Legal Recovery's request for dismissal under the three-year service statute.
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing.
Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CVA) |