Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Order Declaring Plaintiff Bryant Fu A Vexatious Litigant, For Security, And For Prefiling Order
SF Superior Court - Law & Motion / Discovery Dept 301 - CGC22599369 - August 5, 2025 Hearing date: August 5, 2025 Case number: CGC22599369 Case title: BRYANT FU VS. SHUZHEN TU ET AL Case Number: | | CGC22599369 | Case Title: | | BRYANT FU VS. SHUZHEN TU ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-08-05 09:00 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Order Declaring Plaintiff Bryant Fu A Vexatious Litigant, For Security, And For Prefiling Order | Rulings: | | Matter on Calendar for Tuesday, August 5, 2025, Line 4, 2. DEFENDANT VI DAN TRAN'S Notice Of Motion And Motion For An Order Declaring Plaintiff Bryant Fu A Vexatious Litigant, For Security, And For Prefiling Order.
Defendant Vi Dan Tran's motion for an order declaring plaintiff Bryant Fu a vexatious litigant and for related relief is denied. The court grants the unopposed requests for judicial notice and takes judicial notice of the entire docket in the cases filed with this court.
It appears that in case number CGC-18-572347, Fu sued three defendants and all were dismissed (either through his voluntary dismissal, which counts as an adverse determination for purposes of the vexatious litigant statute, see Karnazes v. The Lauriedale Homeowners Assn. (2023) 96 Cal.App.5th 275) or after a demurrer). Similarly, CGC-20-586049 involves Fu's dismissal of the entire case against multiple defendants without prejudice, before he filed proofs of service of any of the defendants. Fu dismissed his involuntary bankruptcy petition against Tina Yan. (The Court's complete tentative ruling was e-mailed to the parties.)
For the 9:00 a.m. calendar, all attorneys and parties may appear in Department 301 remotely or in person. Remote hearings will be conducted by videoconference using Zoom. (Dept. 301 Zoom ID 161 502 4290; Passcode 700956.) To appear remotely at the hearing, go to the court's website at sfsuperiorcourt.org under "Online Services," navigate to "Tentative Rulings," and click on the appropriate link, or dial the corresponding phone number.
Any party who contests a tentative ruling must send an email to contestdept301tr@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties by 4pm stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. The subject line of the email shall include the line number, case name and case number. The text of the email shall include the name and contact information, including email address, of the attorney or party who will appear at the hearing. Counsel for the prevailing party is required to prepare a proposed order which repeats verbatim the substantive portion of the tentative ruling and must email it to contestdept301tr@sftc.org prior to the hearing even if the tentative ruling is not contested.
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”
The court no longer provides a court reporter in the Law & Motion or Discovery Department. Parties may retain their own reporter, who may appear in the courtroom or remotely. A retained reporter must be a California certified court reporter (CSR), for only a CSR's transcript may be used in California courts. If a CSR is being retained, include in your email all of the following: their name, CSR and telephone numbers, and their individual work email address. =(302/CVA) | |