DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
FL-24-00129·sanbenito·Civil·Family Law Discovery
Hearing todayDENIED

Ceja, Veronica Soledad vs. Cortes Ruiz, Victor Manuel

Petitioner’s Request for a Protective Order

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
1
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffCeja, Veronica Soledad
DefendantCortes Ruiz, Victor Manuel

Ruling

FL-24-00129 Ceja, Veronica Soledad vs. Cortes Ruiz, Victor Manuel Petitioner’s Request for a Protective Order pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2033.080 is DENIED. The court, for good cause shown, may make any order that justice requires to protect any party from unwarranted annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden and expense. (Code of Civ. Proc. §2033.080.) Here, Petitioner seeks a protective order on the ground that Respondent’s 35 Requests for Admissions are oppressive or unduly burdensome. However, Respondent has declared that he propounded the discovery requests to discovery whether Petitioner acquired specific properties during a period of time that exceeded 10 years.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share