DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
34-2022-00330270-CU-PA-GDS·sacramento·Civil·Personal Injury
Hearing 11 months agoMandatory Appearance of all parties required.

Mikalai Piatrouski vs. Carlos Alberto Arias

Case Management Conference

Hearing date
Oct 3, 2025
Department
25
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMikalai Piatrouski
DefendantCarlos Alberto Arias
DefendantAaron Michael Bear

Ruling

34-2022-00330270-CU-PA-GDS: Mikalai Piatrouski vs. Carlos Alberto Arias 10/03/2025 Case Management Conference in Department 25

Tentative Ruling

Notices: Please note that cases scheduled for Case Management Conference (CMC) in Department 43 on or after 01/24/25 will be heard in Department 25.

Parties who wish to contest the tentative ruling below must: (1) request a hearing by calling the clerk in Department 25 at (916) 874-8727 no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, and (2) advise opposing counsel of the request. If a hearing is not requested by 4:00 p.m. on the Court day before the scheduled CMC, the tentative ruling shall become the final order of the Court.

If a hearing is requested, the Court assumes all parties will appear remotely via Zoom unless the Court orders in-person attendance. The Department 25 Zoom ID is: 161 1342 1868. To appear telephonically via Zoom, call (833) 568-8864 and enter the Department 25 Zoom ID referenced above.

ALL APPEARANCES, WHETHER REQUESTED BY A PARTY OR ORDERED BY THE COURT, WILL BE HEARD AT 9:00 A.M. IN DEPARTMENT 25 ON THE DATE OF THE SCHEDULED HEARING.

Court’s Tentative Ruling:

Mandatory Appearance of all parties required.

Parties shall appear at the hearing prepared to discuss the status of this case including unserved defendants Aaron Michael Bear (Complaint filed 11/22/2022)

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share