Chan vs. BrandRep LLC
Parties
Ruling
Plaintiff seeks to compel further responses to the Special Interrogatories, arguing that Defendant’s initial and supplemental responses contain waived objections and improperly rewrite, renumber, or reframe the interrogatories actually served.
Defendant failed to serve timely initial responses. Thus, any objections have been waived. (Code Civ. Proc., § 2030.290(a).) The fact that Defendant’s initial and supplemental responses contain objections alone warrants further responses.
The Court finds sanctions to be warranted pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290(c).
In light of the above, the Motion to Compel Further is GRANTED. Defendant is ORDERED to serve further, verified responses without objections to Plaintiff’s first set of Special Interrogatories within 15 days. Defendant is further ORDERED to pay sanctions in the amount of $2,000 within 30 days.
Moving party to give notice. 102 Chan vs. BrandRep LLC, 25-01532021 Off-Calendar. 103 Weaver vs. Architectural, Inc., 23-01316480 Defendants, Sebastian Ernesto Amighini and Karina Andrea Cuevas (collectively, “Defendants”), move for an order to set aside the entries of default and any default judgments as void for lack of personal jurisdiction due to absence of valid service.
Defendants contend that the Court never acquired personal jurisdiction over them and that the defaults and default judgment are void for lack of proper service under Code of Civil Procedure section 473(d) as Plaintiffs failed to satisfy the reasonable diligence requirements in the Hague Convention Article 1 and Code of Civil Procedure section 415.50, such that service by publication was not proper on Defendants who resided in Argentina and Defendants were not served in accordance with California law or the Hague Evidence Convention.
Plaintiffs, Greg Weaver and Haig Youredjian (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) contend that Defendants were properly served with the summons by publication and that the entries of
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”