DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CV0008587·marin·Civil·Administrative Review
Hearing todayAppearances required.

PRESERVE TAM VALLEY v. MARIN COUNTY, ET AL

REVIEW HEARING

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
H
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPRESERVE TAM VALLEY
DefendantMARIN COUNTY

Ruling

Appearances required.

Parties should be prepared to focus their arguments on the term “Scrap and Dismantling Yards” and address the standard of review for an administrative agency’s interpretations of law. To the extent either party argues that the court should consider Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization (1998) 19 Cal.4th 1, 7-8, which was not referenced in Respondent’s brief, the parties shall address the factors set forth under that case as they apply to the meaning of this term.

All parties must comply with Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.10(B) to contest the tentative decision. Parties who request oral argument are required to appear in person or remotely by ZOOM. Regardless of whether a party requests oral argument in accordance with Rule 2.10(B), the prevailing party shall prepare an order consistent with the announced ruling as required by Marin County Superior Court Local Rules, Rule 2.11.

The Zoom appearance information for September, 2026 is as follows: https://marin-courts-ca-gov.zoomgov.com/j/1615487764?pwd=Ob4B5J7LLKcpnkxzJjjEOSHNzEGafG.1

Meeting ID: 161 548 7764 Passcode: 502070

If you are unable to join by video, you may join by telephone by calling (669) 254-5252 and using the above-provided passcode. Zoom appearance information may also be found on the Court’s website: https://www.marin.courts.ca.gov

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share