BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. ERIKA STEARNS
DEMURRER to Amended ANSWER to COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679592 - November 24, 2025 Hearing date: November 24, 2025 Case number: CUD25679592 Case title: BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. ERIKA STEARNS Case Number: | | CUD25679592 | Case Title: | | BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY VS. ERIKA STEARNS | Court Date: | | 2025-11-24 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended ANSWER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 24, 2025. Line 9.
PLAINTIFF BRIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY DEMURRER to Amended ANSWER to COMPLAINT is SUSTAINED with leave to amend for Defendant to allege ultimate facts, not conclusions, in support of each affirmative defense. Demurrer is properly set for hearing. =(501/MEW)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”