DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679553·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 10 months agoMOOT

MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. RUSTY SCHRYER ET AL

MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Oct 15, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Strike rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffMERIDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP
DefendantRUSTY SCHRYER

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679553 - October 15, 2025 Hearing date: October 15, 2025 Case number: CUD25679553 Case title: MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. RUSTY SCHRYER ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679553 | Case Title: | | MERIDIAN MANAGEMENT GROUP VS. RUSTY SCHRYER ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-10-15 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for October 15, 2025 line 11. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE COMPLAINT is MOOT.

First Amended Complaint on file. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252]. Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share