DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CVPS2509563·riverside·Probate·Collection
Hearing in about 2 hoursNo tentative ruling. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear.

LVNV FUNDING LLC VS PATRONE

Motion to be relieved as counsel

Hearing date
Sep 2, 2026
Department
PS4
Judge
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffLVNV FUNDING LLC
DefendantJEFF PATRONE

Ruling

1. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING RE: MOTION TO BE LVNV FUNDING LLC VS CVPS2509563 RELIEVED AS COUNSEL FOR JEFF PATRONE PATRONE Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.

2. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME HEARING ON MOTION TO VACATE DISMISSAL 664.6 AND ENTRY CAPITAL ONE N.A. VS CVPS2509689 JUDGMENT UNDER TERMS OF HAMMON STIPULATION SETTLEMENT BY CAPITAL ONE N.A. Tentative Ruling: No tentative ruling. The motion does not comply with Local Rule 3316C. Parties wishing to argue the motion are ordered to appear. Appearance may be telephonic.

3. CASE # CASE NAME HEARING NAME MOTION FOR AN ORDER DEEMING WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. THE TRUTH OF THE MATTERS CVPS2600349 VS BELTRAN, AN SPECIFIED IN PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST INDIVIDUAL FOR ADMISSIONS AS ADMITTED BY WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. Tentative Ruling: Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.’s unopposed motion for an order deeming matters admitted is GRANTED. Requests 1 through 9, inclusive, in plaintiff’s request for admissions (set one) are deemed admitted for all purposes in this litigation.

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share