DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD25679345·sf·Civil·Real Property/Housing
Hearing 9 months agoDENIED

PARKMERCED OWNER, LLC VS. CHRISTY PINGOL ET AL

Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Default Judgment For Lack Of Proper Service

Hearing date
Nov 14, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffPARKMERCED OWNER, LLC
DefendantCHRISTY PINGOL

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25679345 - November 14, 2025 Hearing date: November 14, 2025 Case number: CUD25679345 Case title: PARKMERCED OWNER, LLC VS. CHRISTY PINGOL ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25679345 | Case Title: | | PARKMERCED OWNER, LLC VS. CHRISTY PINGOL ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Default Judgment For Lack Of Proper Service | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 14, 2025. Line 15. DEFENDANT CHRISTY PINGOL, AN INDIVIDUAL Notice Of Motion And Motion To Vacate Default Judgment For Lack Of Proper Service. is DENIED.

Defendant moves to set aside the judgment solely under CCP 473(d) claiming that Defendant has not been personally served. Proof of Service on file by a registered process server indicates service by substitute service, a proper method of service. =(501/REQ)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share