MISSION BAY 9 LP VS. CHELAN CASSIDY ET AL
DEMURRER to COMPLAINT
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD25678934 - November 25, 2025 Hearing date: November 25, 2025 Case number: CUD25678934 Case title: MISSION BAY 9 LP VS. CHELAN CASSIDY ET AL Case Number: | | CUD25678934 | Case Title: | | MISSION BAY 9 LP VS. CHELAN CASSIDY ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-25 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 25, 2025. Line 9.
DEFENDANT CHELAN CASSIDY DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is Overruled, 5 days to answer. The notice sufficiently specifies the portions of the lease documents that have allegedly been breached and how to correct those breaches. The notice sufficiently complies with the Rent Ordinance and applicable SFRB rules. The complaint attaches sufficient pages of the lease. =(501/HEK)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”