DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
26PR000002·napa·Civil·Probate
Hearing todayGRANTED

Estate of Richard Lane Wyant

Petition for final distribution on waiver of accounting; Allowance of statutory attorney fees; Costs

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
B
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Petition rulings statewide →

Parties

OtherRichard Lane Wyant

Ruling

TENTATIVE RULING: Both matters are CONTINUED to September 29, 2026, at 8:30 a.m. in Dept. A to permit Conservator to address the following item.

The Summary of Account indicates Disbursements in the amount of $59,007.10, whereas Schedule C shows Disbursements in the amount of $58,213.10. This discrepancy is not addressed through the Petition.

Petitioner may address this discrepancy either through an Amended Petition, or a Declaration, as appropriate. Any such document shall be served and filed on or before September 21, 2026.

Estate of Richard Lane Wyant 26PR000002

PETITION FOR FINAL DISTRIBUTION ON WAIVER OF ACCOUNTING; FOR ALLOWANCE OF COMPENSATION FOR STATUTORY ATTORNEY FEES; AND FOR COSTS

TENTATIVE RULING: The petition is GRANTED, including fees as prayed.

CIVIL LAW & MOTION CALENDAR – Hon. Joseph J. Solga, Dept. B (Historic Courthouse) at 8:30 a.m.

Rianna Mebane et al v. Jimmy Loy Moon et al 24CV001153

MOTION TO BE RELIEVED AS COUNSEL

TENTATIVE RULING: The Motion is GRANTED.

The moving party failed to include in the notice of this motion proper notice of the Court’s tentative ruling system as required by Local Rule 2.9. Moving party is directed to immediately provide, by telephone call AND email, the missing notice to opposing party/ies forthwith. The requirements for requesting oral argument under Local Rule 2.9 remain in effect. However, the Court may grant belated requests for oral argument or continuance of hearing, made by any party who represents it did not timely receive the required notice, regardless of whether or not moving party is present at the hearing.

Thomas Pollock et al v. Angel Melendez Pimentel et al 25CV000964

DEFENDANT FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY’S MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF’S FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION AND INTERROGATORIES

TENTATIVE RULING: The motion is DENIED.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share