DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD22670463·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoGRANTED in part. The total amount taxed is $145.85.

ANSON KWAN VS. MING BANG FENG ET AL

Motion To Tax Costs On Appeal

Hearing date
Nov 3, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Motion to Tax Costs rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$101.60$44.25$145.85

Parties

PlaintiffANSON KWAN
DefendantMING BANG FENG

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 3, 2025. Line 1. DEFENDANTS' Motion To Tax Costs On Appeal is GRANTED in part. The following items from Plaintiff-Appellant's Memorandum of Costs Worksheet, under category 6, are taxed: (1) Process Server Service Fee for paying fee to Court for Preparation of Record, $101.60, because this cost was not reasonably necessary; and (2) Process Server Service Fee for filing Appellant's Extension of Time to File Reply Brief, $44.25, because Plaintiff-Appellant did not file for an extension of time to file the reply brief.

Accordingly, the total amount taxed is $145.85 only. =(501/CFH) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849). Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.

A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share