DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CUD20667352·sf·Civil·Unlawful Detainer
Hearing 9 months agoSUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part

FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 14, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Mixed

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffFELL HOLDINGS LLC
DefendantFELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC
DefendantLAURENCE NASEY
DefendantDENIZE BORGES

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CUD20667352 - November 14, 2025 Hearing date: November 14, 2025 Case number: CUD20667352 Case title: FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL Case Number: | | CUD20667352 | Case Title: | | FELL HOLDINGS LLC VS. FELL ST AUTOMOTIVE CLINIC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-14 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 14, 2025. Line 18.1.

DEFENDANT LAURENCE NASEY, DENIZE BORGES DEMURRER to 1ST Amended COMPLAINT. is SUSTAINED in part and OVERRULED in part.

To the extent Plaintiff's sole cause of action for unlawful detainer is based on CCP 1161(3), the demurrer is sustained without leave to amend. A cause of action based on CCP 1161(3) requires notice. The proviso excusing a landlord from providing a notice demanding performance for a covenant that cannot be performed does not excuse the landlord from giving three days' notice demanding possession of the property. As it is clear that no such notice was given, this is an incurable defect.

To the extent Plaintiff's sole cause of action for unlawful detainer is based on CCP 1161(1), the demurrer is overruled, as the First Amended Complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action under that section. =(501/REQ)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share