DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CPF20517292·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 11 months agoGRANTED in part and DENIED in part

T&C PROPERTIES, LLC VS. ST. JAMES PROPERTY CO., LLC

Notice Of Motion And Motion For Award Of Prevailing Party Attorney Fees

Hearing date
Oct 8, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Moving Party

Motion type

Browse all Motion for Attorney Fees rulings statewide →

Monetary amounts referenced

$83,397.50$10,000

Parties

PlaintiffT&C PROPERTIES, LLC
DefendantST. JAMES PROPERTY CO., LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CPF20517292 - October 8, 2025 Hearing date: October 8, 2025 Case number: CPF20517292 Case title: T&C PROPERTIES, LLC VS. ST. JAMES PROPERTY CO., LLC Case Number: | | CPF20517292 | Case Title: | | T&C PROPERTIES, LLC VS. ST. JAMES PROPERTY CO., LLC | Court Date: | | 2025-10-08 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion And Motion For Award Of Prevailing Party Attorney Fees | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Motion calendar for October 8, 2025, line 1.

St. James' Motion for Award of Prevailing Party Attorney Fees is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Motion is granted in the amount of $83,397.50 for appeal and in the amount of $10,000 for reasonable and necessary fees incurred in this litigation post appeal. Motion is otherwise denied for the reasons outlined in opposition. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom [Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252].

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not so notified and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share