DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25629130·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 9 months agoOFF CALENDAR. First Amended Complaint on file.

KEYHAN MOHANNA ET AL VS. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 18, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffKEYHAN MOHANNA
DefendantHSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC., MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, NAMA SERIES 2007-A3
DefendantPHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION
DefendantWESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25629130 - November 18, 2025 Hearing date: November 18, 2025 Case number: CGC25629130 Case title: KEYHAN MOHANNA ET AL VS. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25629130 | Case Title: | | KEYHAN MOHANNA ET AL VS. HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-18 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 18, 2025. Line 5. DEFENDANT HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC., MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, NAMA SERIES 2007-A3, PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, WESTERN PROGRESSIVE, LLC DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is OFF CALENDAR. First Amended Complaint on file. =(501/CFH)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share