DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25626881·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoCONTINUED

JOSIE CARTER VS. IDA SADLER

DEMURRER to COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 7, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Dec 4, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffJOSIE CARTER
DefendantIDA SADLER AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF QUEENIE ANDERSON AKA QUEEN ANDERSON

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 7, 2025. Line 8. DEFENDANT IDA SADLER AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF QUEENIE ANDERSON AKA QUEEN ANDERSON DEMURRER to COMPLAINT is continued to December 4, 2025. Parties to provide courtesy copies of their filings in support of and in opposition to the demurrer no later than November 26, 2025 with cover letters reflecting the new hearing date. =(501/REQ) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share