DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
22CV408970·santaclara·Civil·Contract
Hearing todayDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Navy Federal Credit Union et al. v. Roger College

Plaintiff’s motion to enter judgment by stipulation

Hearing date
Sep 1, 2026
Department
10
Prevailing
Defendant

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffNavy Federal Credit Union
DefendantRoger College

Ruling

SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 10 Honorable Jeffrey B. El-Hajj Blanca Than, Courtroom Clerk 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113

DATE: September 1, 2026 TIME: 9:00 A.M. / 9:01 A.M. To contest the ruling, you must call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. You must also contact the other side before 4:00 P.M. to inform them that you plan to contest the ruling. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.1308(a)(1); Local Rule 8.D.)

**Please specify the issue to be contested when calling the Court and counsel**

9:00 A.M. LINE # CASE # CASE TITLE RULING

Line 1 22CV408970 Navy Federal Plaintiff’s motion to enter judgment by stipulation. (Code Civ. Proc., § Credit Union et 664.6.) Notice is not proper. The proof of service indicates the motion was al. v. Roger served by mail to defendant directly. Defendant has counsel of record. The College motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to a properly noticed motion. The court will prepare the order.

Line 2 23CV420710 Adam Valle v. Plaintiff Adam Valle’s motion to tax costs. (Code Civ. Proc., 1033.5.) Ford Motor Notice is proper and the motion is opposed by defendant Ford Motor Company et al. Company. A prevailing party is entitled to costs reasonably necessary to the conduct of the litigation, unless those costs are among those listed in Code of Civil Procedure 1033.5, subdivision (b). Defendant was declared the prevailing party in the judgment entered in February 2026.

Plaintiff’s motion to tax costs states that plaintiff filed a motion for relief for his failure to oppose summary judgment, but no motion was ever filed. Plaintiff challenges two categories of costs: $3,276.58 in filing fees (which includes $1,435 in mediation fees) and $62.98 in “other” costs. The court finds all claimed costs were both reasonable in amount and reasonably necessary to the conduct of litigation. None are prohibited as a matter of law. Defendant submitted invoices supporting the memorandum of costs. Plaintiff submitted no evidence to rebut that prima facie showing. Plaintiff’s motion to tax costs is DENIED. Defendant is awarded costs of $3,339.56. The court will prepare the order.

Line 3 23CV428277 Stratim Capital Click LINE 3 or scroll down for ruling. Growth Fund, LLC et al. v. Altierre Corporation et al.

2

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share