DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC25622660·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 9 months agoOVERRULED, 20 days to answer. Plaintiff's Declaration in support of opposition is stricken.

TAHA KHAN VS. 1453 GRANT LLC ET AL

DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT

Hearing date
Nov 13, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
Plaintiff

Motion type

Browse all Demurrer rulings statewide →

Causes of action

Parties

PlaintiffTAHA KHAN
Defendant1453 GRANT LLC

Ruling

SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25622660 - November 13, 2025 Hearing date: November 13, 2025 Case number: CGC25622660 Case title: TAHA KHAN VS. 1453 GRANT LLC ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25622660 | Case Title: | | TAHA KHAN VS. 1453 GRANT LLC ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-13 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 13, 2025. Line 3.1.

DEFENDANT 1453 GRANT LLC DEMURRER to Amended COMPLAINT is OVERRULED, 20 days to answer. First Amended Complaint sufficiently states cause of action for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress and cause of action for nuisance is not duplicative of cause of action for negligence as it seeks different damages, while arising out of the same set of facts. Plaintiff's Declaration in support of opposition is stricken. =(501/REQ)

Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.

Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share