| Case | County / Judge | Motion | Ruling | Indexed | Hearing |
|---|
Notice Of Motion For An Order Requiring Plaintiffs To Post A Security Undertaking Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure
SF Superior Court - Real Property / Housing Dept 501 - CGC25621262 - November 20, 2025 Hearing date: November 20, 2025 Case number: CGC25621262 Case title: JDS MONTGOMERY LLC ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL Case Number: | | CGC25621262 | Case Title: | | JDS MONTGOMERY LLC ET AL VS. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ET AL | Court Date: | | 2025-11-20 09:30 AM | Calendar Matter: | | Notice Of Motion For An Order Requiring Plaintiffs To Post A Security Undertaking Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure | Rulings: | | Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 20, 2025.
Line 4.1. DEFENDANT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, SAN FRANCISCO ASSESSOR-RECORDER, SAN FRANCISCO CONTROLLER, SAN FRANCISCO TAX COLLECTOR Motion For An Order Requiring Plaintiffs To Post A Security Undertaking Pursuant To California Code Of Civil Procedure; is OFF CALENDAR, Amended Notice of Motion on file. =(501/CFH)
Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).
Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required.
Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests.
A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”