CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC. vs G.L. FOOD WHOLESALE INC.
Motion for Stipulated Judgment
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
22CV024436: CONSUMER ADVOCACY GROUP, INC. vs G.L. FOOD WHOLESALE INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al. 09/01/2026 Hearing on Motion for Stipulated Judgment filed by Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. (Plaintiff) CRS# 553103999057 in Department 512
Tentative Ruling - 08/31/2026 Elizabeth Riles
The Hearing on Motion for Stipulated Judgment filed by Consumer Advocacy Group, Inc. (Plaintiff) CRS# 553103999057 scheduled for 09/01/2026 is continued to 09/15/2026 at 02:30 PM in Department 512 at Hayward Hall of Justice.
CONTESTING TENTATIVE RULINGS
PLEASE NOTE: If any party contests the tentative ruling, the hearing on the motion will occur remotely via the court's own video-conferencing system.
Pursuant to California Rule of Court 3.1308, subdivision (a)(1), this tentative ruling will become the order of the Court unless it is contested before 4:00 PM on the court day preceding the noticed hearing date.
To contest a tentative ruling, a party should do the following:
First, the party must notify Department 512, by email at Dept512@alameda.courts.ca.gov and copy all counsel of record and self-represented parties. The contesting party must state in the subject line of the email the case name, case number and motion.
Second, the party shall log into the eCourt Public Portal, search for this case (e.g., by case number), select the case name, select the "Tentative Rulings" tab, click the "Click to Contest this Ruling" button, enter the party's name and a brief statement of the party's reason for contesting the tentative, and click "Proceed."
Parties may appear via videoconference, using the Zoom.com website or application.
TO CONNECT TO ZOOM:
Join the meeting using the following link: https://www.zoomgov.com/j/16057661931 Join the meeting by Phone:
Meeting ID: 160 5766 1931
1 669 254 5252, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 1 669 216 1590, 16057661931# US (San Jose) 833 568 8864 US Toll-free
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”