Jasmine Shavon Williams v. Adrien Eugene Godbold
Review Hearing: Compliance with Orders Issued at 6/02/26 Hearing
Motion type
Parties
Ruling
1 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 4
5) 6 JASMINE SHAVON WILLIAMS,) Case Number: FPT-25-378795) 7 Petitioner) Hearing Date: September 1, 2026) 8 VS.) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM) 9 ADRIEN EUGENE GODBOLD,) Department: 404) 10 Respondent) Presiding: AI MORI) 11) 12 REVIEW HEARING: COMPLIANCE WITH ORDERS ISSUED AT 6/02/26 HEARING 13 TENTATIVE RULING 14 Having read and considered the pleadings, declarations, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the
15 Court makes the following findings and orders:
16 1) The parties in this matter are Petitioner Jasmine Williams (Mother) and Respondent Adrien Godbold
17 (Father). The parties have one minor child, Brince (DOB: 4/16/2021, age 5).
18 2) At the prior 6/2/2026 hearing, both parties appeared. The Court granted Father’s request to transfer
19 venue of this case to Alameda County.
20 3) On 8/12/2026, the Court transmitted to the Alameda County Superior Court copies of all documents
21 filed in this case.
22 4) The Court finds that the transfer of this case to Alameda County has been effectuated. The Court will
23 make no additional orders in this matter.
24 5) The Court will prepare the Findings and Order After Hearing.
28
29
Cited authorities
Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities
Ask about this ruling
Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”