DecisionDepot
California legal research
All cases
CGC24612954·sf·Civil·Real Property
Hearing 10 months agoCONTINUED

WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE VS. 644 BROADWAY, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY ET AL

Joinder Of Non-Party Receiver'S Motion To Compel Turnover Of Amounts Held In Client Trust Account

Hearing date
Nov 7, 2025
Department
501
Prevailing
N/A
Next hearing
Nov 19, 2025

Motion type

Browse all Other rulings statewide →

Parties

PlaintiffWELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF HOLDERS OF COMM 2018-COR3 MORTGAGE TRUST COMMERICAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2018-COR3
Defendant644 BROADWAY, LLC

Ruling

Real Property/Housing Court Law and Motion Calendar for November 7, 2025. Line 5.2. PLAINTIFF WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BENEFIT OF HOLDERS OF COMM 2018-COR3 MORTGAGE TRUST COMMERICAL MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2018-COR3 Joinder Of Non-Party Receiver'S Motion To Compel Turnover Of Amounts Held In Client Trust Account is continued to November 19, 2025 to be heard by the Honorable Charles F. Haines. =(501/REQ) Parties may appear in-person, telephonically or via Zoom (Video - Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849; or Phone Dial in: (669) 254-5252; Webinar ID: 160 560 5023; Password: 172849).

Parties who intend to appear at the hearing must give notice to opposing parties and the court promptly, but no later than 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing unless the tentative ruling has specified that a hearing is required. Notice of contesting a tentative ruling shall be provided by sending an email to the court to Department501ContestTR@sftc.org with a copy to all other parties stating, without argument, the portion(s) of the tentative ruling that the party contests. A party may not argue at the hearing if the opposing party is not notified, and the opposing party does not appear. | |

Cited authorities

Extracting citations from the ruling text…
Verify against the source PDF — LLM extraction may miss or mis-normalize citations.

Looking for case law or statutes not cited here? Search published authorities

Ask about this ruling

Examples: “Why did the court rule this way?” · “What were the procedural grounds?” · “Is appearance required?”

Answers reference only this ruling's text. Not legal advice — always verify against the source PDF.

Find similar rulings

Source

Share